Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cicero's Pizza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS 10:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Cicero's Pizza
Since there seems to be a non-notable pizza parlour/chain theme today. This one is a single outlet in San Jose.
 * Delete as per my nom.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  19:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable company, WP:CORP refers.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   19:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm sure it's a good place, but it's not notable. --Coredesat 21:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong KEEP, this "outlet" as you call it has strong historical and social ties to Apple Computer, Silicon Valley and Cupertino, California. Not only that but being the highest rated pizza resturant in Silicon Valley is definitely notable considering the diversity of the region and their diverse clientel. Also I'd point out it meeds criteria #1 of WP:CORP. which states, "The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself. This criterion excludes:
 * Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company.
 * Trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories.
 * This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. " Cicero's Pizza meets this requirements and does not fit the exclusions, please see the following, , . Gateman1997 01:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment If its to be kept, section about the reopening by a relative should be cleaned up as it sounds like an advert. Kevin_b_er 02:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * What advert? And to my knowledge no relative has ever even seen this page let alone written an advert on it.Gateman1997 02:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ahh, very sorry. I rephrased it so that the meaning is clear. Kevin_b_er 02:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.