Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cicero Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Cicero Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Somehow and surprisingly removed (after it was PRODed) with the thin basis in that "there were news and that it was not an advertisement" but that's in fact what this is exactly; it's advertising what there to say about the company and its services and then having the sheerness to list such trivial PR awards, complete with the PR sources. Searches of course not finding anything but a few pieces of PR, nothing at local news media either, there's simply nothing at all actually suggesting this could ever be improved and accepted since the listed links themselves are simply PR links talking about the company itself or its activities (i.e "City gives company $2M for headquarters", "Cicero Group's new headquarters", "Cicero acquires company", etc."; I should then note the first immediate source....is the company's own website; that in itself is PR so the claims of this not being an advertisement are not relevant. SwisterTwister   talk  03:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete per nom. Sources are a flurry of fluff, no WP:CORPDEPTH - David Gerard (talk) 13:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The article needs an overhaul but a google news search seems to indicate coverage in multiple reliable sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete this version per WP:TNT / WP:PROMO; nothing to salvage here. No prejudice to recreation if someone wants to create a neutral article based on RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 14:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As it doesn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD. Almost all sources are local. Every single source I found is either a passing mention of a survey conducted by the company or "so and so from Cicero corp said" something. This doesn't amount to significant coverage. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * delete Another Corporate SPAM Wikiepdia facing these days in abundance!Light2021 (talk) 14:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.