Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cicero Method


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Cicero Method

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Even if Cicero is often connected to mnemonic methods, this particular method and the texts endorsing it seem utterly non-notable, and the article seem only to advertise it and the books given as reference. I also propose the deletion of the sister articles Chain Method and Russian Doll Method (presently PRODded). (For more background, see also the subpages of the user page of these articles' creator: User:Zmemory/SPM and User:Zmemory/GMS.) Goochelaar  (talk) 09:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Merge all to Mnemonic, there are already some methods listed there. a more formalized list with brief descriptions of each makes more sense than individual short articles. Also add Cicero Method to the list of articles to merge.--RadioFan2 (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all. The role of Cicero in transmitting the art of memory and the characteristics of the "Cicero Method" (as well as the related methods in the other two articles) are already covered in Art of memory. There's nothing here that isn't already covered adequately in that article, except for the spamming of the Ziganov/Kozarenko books. Deor (talk) 15:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge I tried to merge these articles with Giordano Memorization System, but don't know what to do with the original articles. If anyone feels this system isn't notable, I would like to discuss that. I am only a memory buff, and wonder what the difference between two memory systems is as far as wikipedia is concerned. Thank you Zmemory (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2009
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * (Note by the proponent: the articles discussed here were merged in Giordano Memorization System, which has been deleted. So perhaps these articles might now be speedy deleted?) Goochelaar  (talk) 00:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.