Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cicero Networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 03:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Cicero Networks

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP, not enough notability. TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  03:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology,  and Ireland. AllyD (talk) 08:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. While I found three national news sources (in the Irish Times), which seem to deal with the subject as a primary topic (and added them to support the text), they do not support notability under SIGCOV. (All three are mainly based on quotes and press release material which appears to originate from the company, and therefore not independent and instead of the "churnalism" type common around just about every company everywhere). Otherwise there is nothing to suggest that this small company, which had perhaps max 30 employees at its peak, attained notability during its 20 or so years in existence. The apparent SPA/PROMO nature of the article's initial creation does little to help matters. Guliolopez (talk) 13:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.