Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cider House Rules


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Cider House Rules. (non-admin closure) sst✈  05:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Cider House Rules

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Podcast with no claim of notability. No significant coverage in external reliable sources. LK (talk) 03:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Cider House Rules (which includes a hatnote directing readers to The Cider House Rules (film)). After conducting independent research, I could find no coverage in secondary sources. Therefore, I have concluded that this fails WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 08:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as perhaps this is best connected to that, questionable for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  02:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.