Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cillit Bang EP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Cillit Bang EP

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails notability criteria for albums. The sources in the article are jut passing mentions. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  15:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep (as creator) The nominator says that the sources are only passing mentions, however WP:NALBUM actually states:
 * "In general, if the musician or ensemble is notable, and if the album in question has been mentioned in multiple reliable sources, then their officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia."

Acather96 (talk) 16:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Artist may be notable, just, but I would expect the requirement of "multiple" reliable sources to satisfied by more than two, either of which could be seen as passing references or promotional. It didn't even chart, even in a specialist chart, and that, as far as I am concerned, is a killer in the notability stakes. Rodhull  andemu  01:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment FYI, its claimed in the JAKAZiD article that it reached number 3 in the BBC Indie charts and number 6 in the BBC Dance charts. However, the refs in the article simply link to a page with the current chart information, so I am not sure how to verify. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 07:52, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Found an archived version to show that is acheived the number 3 spot in the BBC Indie Charts. Acather96 (talk) 08:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:NALBUM also says: "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  15:57, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Stub with no likelihood of growing. EP (not a studio album, as creator cites above) without indication of notability.  ~ [  Scott M. Howard  ] ~ [  Talk  ]:[  Contribs  ] ~  18:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.