Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cincinnati Fan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 15:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Cincinnati Fan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Insufficient evidence of notability FisherQueen (Talk) 21:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep. Needs outside sources, reads a bit like an official corporate history, but still notable enough manly due to longevity. Realkyhick 21:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete They make fans. So do other non-notable companies. Article written by single purpose account . Fails WP:CORP & WP:NOT. Caknuck 21:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete per nom. Google search for company's name and year of establishment and founder's name turns up exactly 2 hits - one of which is this article. Apparently no one has bothered to write about this company despite its age, so it fails WP:CORP by lacking multiple independent sources. Resurgent insurgent 06:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above comment. DTD  (speak)
 * Delete. Interesting history about this company (clever, a dust vacuum that has only been revised twice!), but WP:CORP comes to mind here, regretfully.  If there are sources, my mind can be changed - no prejudice to recreation as appropriate. --Dennisthe2 20:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.