Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cincinnati Time Store


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Cincinnati Time Store
The result was speedy keep. No reason for deletion given (WP:SKCRIT). –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC) (non-admin closure)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reversion of an undiscussed blanking and redirect. I thought we had a discussion process for deleting articles? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Article quality is not a reason for deletion, notability is. This is a good topic, it should not be summarily removed. (The irony of someone calling themselves "Czar" choosing to remove an article on anarchism or mutualism does not go unnoticed!) Andy Dingley (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I see no rationale for deletion in the nomination nor any reason that this does not satisfy WP:GNG.--TM 10:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 12:12, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 12:12, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 12:12, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.