Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cincinnatus Fabian D'Abreo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  samee  talk 10:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Cincinnatus Fabian D'Abreo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Started by creator and obviously nothing to establish why he is notable. Nothing in Google Books. Fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  07:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:19, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep there are sufficient sources for a biography on a clearly notable figure. Wikipedia's well-known WP:BIAS against non-Anglophonic people should be understood. Deleting this article would be another example.--TM 13:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - has a settlement named after him, was named one of the twelve leading figures in Sindh, two clear claims to notability. Warofdreams talk 16:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - sufficient sources to pass the basic inclusion criteria, barely. There are most likely other non-English sources that could be used here as well. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I still can't see why he is notable. Not a single reliable source discusses him. Notability is not inherited, if you have a locality by your name that does't makes you automatically notable. WP:BIAS is we have different standards for Catholics. Störm   (talk)  11:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Not Inherited is Not Policy. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write)  17:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC).
 * Keep - another source -- -- is mentioned here. Υπογράφω (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.