Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinco Ranch High School controversies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Cinco Ranch High School controversies


I feel this has WP:NPOV on a high school that is not nationally known for being controversial. Some of the content seems non-verifiable. In addition, it may be too easy to add weasel words. WhisperToMe 20:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Also see for why this is a terrible idea for an article. WhisperToMe 20:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, weak speedy delete, at least one section (which I intend to delete upon finishing this discussion) is a blatant BLP violation. The nomination pretty much says it all.  Corvus cornix 21:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, utterly unnotable. If it were a "controversy" featured on CNN that would be one thing, but this is stuff that isn't important enough for the school paper (official one, anyway). --Dhartung | Talk 21:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete any really well sourced material should go in the article for the school--only the drug tests seem to have a RS. As for BLP, no names are mentioned either in the article or the links--had any been, I would have removed that section or link now without waiting for the close of the AfD.  BLP concerns only named or identifiable people.  My thought on BLP is that it should be enforced strictly, but within defined limits. DGG 22:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Several names were mentioned, before I removed them. See this edit.  Corvus cornix 23:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * good, removal of clearly BLP violating content is the first thing to do-- whether or not we keep an article.  . DGG 23:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree it is a blatant BLP violation. Andman8 02:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 05:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 05:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not the place to come complain about your school. These "controversies" are in every school.  If Wikipedia had existed when I was in high school, I probably would have wanted to complain about my administrators every time they didn't see the world from a 16-year-old's point of view, too. --BigDT 05:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is information of purely local interest, about a non-notable school in a non-notable town. This kind of information belongs in a school newspaper. &#9679;DanMS • Talk 04:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge anything sourced to Cinco Ranch High School and delete. The contents of this article were split off from Cinco Ranch High School in this edit for a reason which is not disclosed.  And I can't come up with one.  It's not that the parent article is too long.  I suspect the editor in question was trying to hide this stuff, as he or she has been aggressively reverting anybody who tries to work these things back in, and the only links to the controversy article is in the template at the very bottom of the page or if you happen to click on the school motto in the infobox.  If the stuff belongs at WP at all, it belongs in the school article.  If it's adequately sourced, merge it back to Cinco Ranch High School.  If it's not adequately sourced, bin it.  Then delete this article, because who's going to search for that title? --Butseriouslyfolks 05:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.