Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Cindery Island. Article history deleted. It appears this is the first time there was a deletion discussion about this article, so other issues could be addressed if they crop up again after this. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Cindery

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

User continues to re-create non-notable micronation article over redirect. ninety:one 16:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect - The article about the micronation is obviously not notable. Cindery should redirect to Cindery Island, the redirect should be protected, and Lamprea should be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Neelix (talk) 16:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Don't talk about the author, guys. Tell us why the article doesn't meet the guidelines. Kafziel Complaint Department 17:57, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonnotable, unreferenced, "made-up-in-school-one-day" borderline nonsense. The author's intentions aside, which are at least questionable, this simply does not pass muster.  Delete and redirect back to the island. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  00:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not establish notability and reads like an advertisement. VG &#x260E; 00:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT. It seems to me that several of the List of micronations could be nominated for deletion too, although that's not a reason for keeping this one (see WP:OTHERSTUFF). Stephen Turner (Talk) 08:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt -- These micronations are a variety of vanity: content without substance. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.