Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Sampson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 09:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Cindy Sampson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable actress, a quick look for reliable sources revealed nothing of note  and the first few pages of google are not showing any reliable sources. Absent reliable sourcing this fails V. RS, N & Bio Spartaz Humbug! 23:54, 16 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - if even a few roles from IMdB can be verified by more reliable sources, then she is a notable actress, although I've never heard of her until now. Bearian (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well that's the point really, the lack of coverage of her roles means that she isn't notable and there are simply no reliable sources out there for her. Spartaz Humbug! 02:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and continue sourcing. Her multiple significant roles in multiple notable productions meets the presumption of WP:ENT. Its a matter of tagging the article for sources and moving on. Granted, she does seem to keep a low profile.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:24, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Question how are we assessing that her roles are significant in notable productions. I know its a judgement thing but surely there should be reviews and bnewspaper articles if this were the case. Spartaz Humbug! 02:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Appears to meet the requirements of WP:ENT. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:00, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.