Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Song


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Cindy Song

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Clear-cut case of WP:BLP1E. Wikipedia is not the news. Badger Drink (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, even the event is not notable. Lots of sources but unremarkable in its entirety. --Pgallert (talk) 15:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: it's sourced, has NPOV, and isn't hurting anything. --Spangineerws (háblame)  14:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * None of which are convincing arguments for inclusion. In fact, the last "argument" you offer is so poor that it's warranted an entire section of its own in "arguments to avoid in deletion debates". Did you even read WP:BLP1E? Badger Drink (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, even the "1" in BLP1E is pretty weak here.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 08:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom., I know this is not a vote, but I agree with JBsupreme. All the citations are to a college newspaper (The Digital Collegian). The title of one of them sums it all up "Song's name, case fading after 4 years". I hate to see things relisted when they are straight forward. --75.161.115.112 (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.