Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Vela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 00:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Cindy Vela

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While a working actress, simply doesn't meet the criteria as per wp:nactor. Similarly, while she has had some press, all of the in-depth coverage is in regards to her dating Sutherland. Notability is not inherited. Absent that coverage, not enough in-depth coverage to show she passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Unfortunately all her roles appear to be minor or are in minor productions, therefore fails WP:NACTOR.  Article can be recreated should she land more prominent roles in notable productions. Hzh (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete one of thousands of low information articles we have on people who never had a significant role in a notable production. Wikipedia is drowining at present in articles on minor actors that are essentially filmographies with birth and death dates of the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR Clean-up-wiki-guy (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep There's just enough sources to pass GNG. I found some articles about her on Newspapers.com in addition to what's in the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:33, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I think this passes GNG, especially after the Newspapers.com sources were found. I added a few more into the article. Thsmi002 (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Strong Keep - I am only saying a strong keep as I am supprised you want to delete this article... helloooo, WP:GNG?!. -- VitalPower | talk  15:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails NACTOR, and dating Kiefer Sutherland fails WP:NOTINHERIT. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Certainly does not meet the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR guidelines. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 23:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Barely passes GNG with sources present. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 00:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - there is coverage of her from before she started dating Kiefer Sutherland related both to her modelling career and as an actress in the viral video Exhibit B-5. She played the title role in a movie which won best feature film at the Boston Film Festival. I believe she meets the notability requirements. Million_Moments (talk) 16:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see why pages about her in relation to Kiefer Sutherland should be discounted. WP:NOTINHERIT states, "Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass WP:GNG." This article passes WP:GNG for significant discussion in secondary sources. Lonehexagon (talk) 14:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.