Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CineMAA Award for Best Film


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to  CineMAA Awards. as suggested by MQS.  DGG ( talk ) 01:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

CineMAA Award for Best Film

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prod removed without rationale; original rationale was that there is no evidence that this article has notability independent of the parent subject, CineMAA Awards. A reference has been added since the prod was removed, but that reference still does not establish this individual award's independent notability. Bundle nomination to follow shortly. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related articles for deletion, all for the same reason:

There are several more related articles with the prod tag still on them; if the prod is removed I will list them here as well. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC) The prods on several other related articles have been removed; I am bundling them with this nomination: &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 17:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 17:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect all back to CineMAA Awards. No independent coverage shown for stand-alone articles.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:11, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: I had considered redirecting all of these to the parent subject, but I just don't see them as plausible search terms. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 13:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, as search terms, they may indeed be quite reasonable to a few billion Indian wikipedians. That presumption should be enough for a redirect.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable.  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 06:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge and redirect to CineMAA Awards. みんな空の下 (トーク) 02:28, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all - per lack of independent notability. Implausible search terms and should anyone happen to attempt searching for a specific award they will be prompted to the lead article after typing "Cinemaa". Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 13:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If you are not Indian, then the terms may seem implausible. But as search terms for a few billion Indian wikipedians, they may indeed be quite reasonable. That presumption should be enough for a redirect after deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all; no notability independent of the main article subject; no reason to create a mess of redirects for a stub article that is already a Google Top Ten result for search term 'Cinemaa'. — Chromancer  talk/cont 02:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge per MQS. Cinemaa itself squeaks by, and redirects are cheap--these search terms aren't that implausible. Drmies (talk) 03:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.