Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinema Museum (London)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snow Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Cinema Museum (London)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:NOTABILITY. Google shows nothing. Lacks "significant coverage in independent reliable sources", fails WP:GNG Hu12 (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Well, sure, a fixed search string like <"Cinema Museum (London)"> is not likely to turn up many results, given that it's not the actual name of the museum.  But a friendlier, while still focused, search strategy like <"Cinema Museum" Lambeth> or <"Cinema Museum" "Ronald Grant"> yields multiple sources in major British newspapers and other potential valuable sources.  I've added some.  A real and significant institution that passes GNG. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as a notable topic as evidenced by Arxiloxos's improvement to the article. I also did a search engine test in Google Books with the keywords "cinema museum" london and found plenty more results. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 13:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 13:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable per WP:GNG, and underscores that an AFD "find sources" template can sometimes be next to useless. Kudos to those that thought to expand their searches in a manner that found decent results.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * And for others who visit this discussion:


 * Keep Passes GNG. Those searches provide sufficient sources.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 22:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable enough. Bearian (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. LenaLeonard (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.