Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinematic Death Mambo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is clearly to delete --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 13:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Cinematic Death Mambo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This has been a one sentence stub for 5 years. Not really a genre just a neologism someone made up. Ridernyc (talk) 04:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable neologism. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 22:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete clearly non-notable neologism. It seems it didnt catch on.-- SabreBD  (talk)  23:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Neologism. The (one) band that claims that this is their style probably doesn't meet WP:BAND. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 19:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Someone's added a bunch of extra information, including a few more bands to which it refers. I think it crosses the "keep" line, but only just. 93.96.235.168 (talk) 16:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * A bunch of red linked and still no sources is far from making any improvements. Ridernyc (talk) 16:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is unsourced and, chances are, it is original research. The term was invented by one of the band members of IBOPA, and does not seem independently notable. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 03:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.