Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinematic rock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If Wictionary needs this, can always be userfied.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Cinematic rock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Could not find notable mentions in reliable source. Seems to fail WP:GNG. However, editors interested in music may have access to other reliable sources. So, nominating for AfD for broader community consensus. Dwaipayan (talk) 01:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Move - to Wiktionary – found a few references but better severed as a definition. ShoesssS Talk 12:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence that this is an established term for a definable music type. Even the quote in the article uses only the first word. Borock (talk) 23:34, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Borock and complete lack of sourcing. As to the quote you could substitute almost any form of music at the start of it to try an illustrate a specific genre. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 00:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a term that is used (with minor frequency) but doesn't seem to be an actual genre of music, just a term people continually reinvent or borrow for airy sounding music in movies. The current article is pure original research and written in an un-encyclopedic tone.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.