Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinesaddle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 20:34, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Cinekinetic and Cinesaddle
Advertising for company and product. Also, the articles are (almost) identical and consist of multiple copyvios from different pages on the manufacturer's web site. Googling reveals only 368 results, most of which are e-commerce sites. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 22:16, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Seems like a speedy delete as it was all copied from the manufacturer's site. Mike young was also copied from the same site and posted by the same editor--JJay 00:15, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Not a speedy, since they're selling overpriced, useless little camera pouches, not this text advertisement for them. On the other hand, there was no need to bring this to afd; sending it through the normal copyvio process has the twin benefits of being less effort and gives you a perfectly valid reason to blank the articles right away. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Cinekinetic is a major company and holds an important position in the market. It should not be deleted as people looking for film equipment may find it useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.211.30 (talk • contribs) 01:18, 25 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.