Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinnamon Gardens (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Let&#39;srun (talk) 12:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Cinnamon Gardens (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBOOK, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Online book stores are not independent or reliable. The authors website is a primary source. Dan arndt (talk) 11:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Sri Lanka. Dan arndt (talk) 11:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: The book has had some critical study in Canada; this from the Univ. of New Brunswick and this from the Univ. of Toronto  Oaktree b (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: and here: and . Easily passes book notability.  Oaktree b (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep - Per WP:BKCRIT. I've done a little clean up on the article, and it could use more. I've also added a section for reviews. This is a new editor's first effort at an article, but they got the basics correct. — Maile (talk) 14:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: The New York Times Book Review is solid, as well as the Textual Practice article. Toughpigs (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources from Oaktree are sufficient for WP:NBOOK. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 16:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.