Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinpathogen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tawker (talk) 22:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Cinpathogen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail GNG and WP:ORG SarahStierch (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nominator. It also seems to be thinly veiled WP:PROMO. ► Philg88 ◄ ♦talk 10:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Article itself fails to explain why this company may be considered notable. I did a google search and couldn't find anything other than the company's own website and press releases. No reliable thrid party sources. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:35, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.