Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinque northern (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, without prejudice to recreation if more information emerges or notability increases.-- Kubigula (talk) 02:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Cinque northern
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

 procedural nomination  Considered at AFD in Aug 2006 (see this version), a sparse turnout led to a 'keep' decision. Article nominated for deletion via WP:PROD by User:The JPS in Aug 2007 (see this version) with the following reasoning: "Orphaned article. Only real sign of notability is an award that is not notable for someone to have created an article about it. Would need complete rewrite." User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 11:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Two awards, really, and an alleged mention in a magazine. This is kind of a tough one, in my opinion. Notability (people) offers as a criterion, "The person has received significant recognized awards or honors." I have combed through every google hit I got on "Cinque Northern" (not so hard, it being an unusual name) and came up with nothing more substantial than what I just added to the article, a reference for the other award. Notability rests on the unsourced magazine mention (I can't find independent verification) and the notability of the awards. The Aperture Award does not seem to have wide notability, based on my search for it. The Angelus Award, by contrast, is a category of awards notable enough that the awarding of it is worthy a mention in Variety. If the Film Magazine honor were confirmed, I'd call this a keep. Since it isn't, I'm momentarily undecided. It hinges on the Angelus Award, I think. And if it's a keep, it needs to be trimmed of quite a lot of unsourced material. --Moonriddengirl 14:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak delete with no prejudice toward recreation in the future, if notability increases. Just not quite there currently. Dean Wormer 05:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per Dean Wormer. Nothing has been added to further support the article in the last five days, so I think it's fair to assume that nothing is going to be. One of the awards seems significant, but it is only an "honorable mention" and the magazine claim is unsourced. I hope Cinque Northern gains notability at some point, because he surely does have a cool name. :) --Moonriddengirl 12:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unable to find any sources in EBSCOhost or ProQuest, and we'd need more information to determine which year this person was mentioned in Filmmaker Magazine in order to even consider it as a source. --User: (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 07:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.