Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinume


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Davewild (talk) 10:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Cinume

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is about video resumes. We already have an article about video resumes and this merely links in a non-notable website. The sources for this article do not even mention the word "Cinume". This seems to be a coatrack like article to promote the Cinume site. Also note this was prodded but disputed.  spryde |  talk  18:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, coatrack site. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

But people are asking what cinumes are. http://www.linkedin.com/mbox?displayMBoxItem=&itemID=358090217_2&goback=%2Eavq_7511_722157_0_*2%2Eavq_138210_3045788_0_*2. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071201155705AAnr9m7. They just don't have a clue. Coatrack site? We don't delete "video resumes" because it links to videoresume.com. Or another site that links to resume.com. We shouldn't delete an article about the definition of a cinume because it happens to link to a site called cinume.com, even if that page appears to have little content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.13.151 (talk) 18:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC) — 75.36.13.151 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Do not delete. Do not redirect to the video resume page. The video resume page has almost no information on it and, in fact, contains warnings that it hasn't been wikified and doesn't meet Wiki's quality standards. At the very least, merge the two articles.--Chanceous 19:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC) — Chanceous (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete, then redirect to Video resume, people will figure it out. AnteaterZot 18:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Some of the content may be moved over to the video resume page. However, except for Time, the rest of the sources are pretty flimsy in terms of WP:RS. Cinume as of right now is a non-notable website that isn't even launched. In fact, all the items about Cinume seem to be about the upcoming launch and spammy in tone (and none of them from reliable secondary sources). That is why I prod'ed it. That is why I AfD'ed it. Finally, if the proper term is Video Resume, Cinume is a neoligism and even more proper to delete. Instead of creating a new page, this should have been added to video resume in order to satisfy what the tags say.  spryde |  talk  20:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as neologism. Fee Fi Foe Fum 22:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not redirect. Promotional neologism. --Dhartung | Talk 02:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * keep - that's the very point of wiki kernitou talk 07:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Invalid comment above struck out.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as non-notable neologism. None of the third-party sources even mention the term 'cinume' and do not verify the text.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.   -- Gavin Collins 12:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as article is thinly disguised spam. The service has not been launched yet, and so fails WP:CRYSTAL.--Gavin Collins 12:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Legit posting adding more info to the video resume article.  Email, kleenex, and qtips were neologistic once too.  --63.151.79.254 20:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC) {{
 * Comment It adds nothing to the video resume article as there are no links between the two articles. Also, I don't think we want to contribute to the genericide of a trademark like you are suggesting. I am not sure of the legal ramifications of doing that but I am sure someone could enlighten me. If Cinume becomes notable and more than a neologism, there will be an article created about the company. For now, the company is not notable and their product is video resumes and we have an article on that.  spryde |  talk  20:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete and do not merge. The term "cinume" does not appear to have any appreciable usage.  If it is kept, then it should be smeged with video resume. -- Whpq (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.