Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinzia Verde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdraw.. I've been persuaded both by the arguments here and by User:Geopenguin that this article passes WP:ACADEMICS and WP:ACADEMICS. (non-admin closure) Mr. Guye (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Cinzia Verde

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Simply fails WP:GNG, mainly due to the lack of independent sources. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof with a GS h-index of 22. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  03:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep That "Career and impact" section makes a good case for international influence and notability. Plus, see h-index above (debatable as a metric as it might be).-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.