Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cipolla Rossa of Tropea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete current article that has a mixed Italian / English title, add the found sources to Red onion that already has a section named 'Red onion of Tropea' and create proper redirects at Red onion of Tropea and Cipolla rossa di Tropea with no prejudice against a future expansion if warranted.--10:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Tikiwont (talk)

Cipolla Rossa of Tropea

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability and cleanup issues has not been met since May 2007 Moosato Cowabata (talk) 01:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Mild Delete It deserves to be deleted. Although I think it could potentially be a legitimate article, for now it is not even close. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMD80 (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reads like a page torn out of a cookery book. The subject is notable, but this article is not. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 02:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. If the subject is notable then the article should be kept and cleaned up, not deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Malleus. --Folantin (talk) 09:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've just spent a few minutes with Google and found out a couple of interesting facts which I've added with references to establish notability. That's what we should be doing, not deleting the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.