Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle Court, Johannesburg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America1000 06:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Circle Court, Johannesburg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing at all to suggest the needed substance for independent notability and my own searches have found nothing better. SwisterTwister  talk  19:49, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. It may be difficult to dig up historical architectural content for South Africa, but here is a book that explicitly describes this building as "important" and goes into a bit of detail about its internal appointments; and here (available in a snippet only) is the discussion of the building in another book that served as the source for the first one. If someone is so inclined, an article about the architects, the Obel brothers, would apparently be a nice addition to our currently slim coverage of South African architects. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.