Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circles (comic book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.-- Wizardman 21:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Circles (comic book)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Another furry comic. There is no assertion of notability, and it is totally unsourced and seems to be nearly totally OR, and this comic only has had 6 issues, not making it particularly long-running. Delete per WP:ATT and WP:N K @  ng  i  e meep! 05:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This article has been on my radar for some time. In addition to the article format, it does in fact appear to be a non-notable comic only published by a genre vanity press. I'm not throughly familiar with the genre though so if some realiable sources emerge from other editors that can verify notability I could be swayed. Since it is printed material and I'm always more inclined to give printed media a little more slack. NeoFreak 12:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've heard of it but that is no reason to keep it, and it makes no assertion of WP:N. Some reliable secondary sources on the subject could change my vote as well, printed material tends to get a little leeway per NeoFreak but it needs to satisfy criteria.  A r k y a n  &#149; (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Reluctant delete given the effort that's gone into it, but nothing to indicate notability. And why do we have so many furry articles, anyway? -  Irides centi   (talk to me!)  17:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Probably due to the large internet presence. It's pretty undeniable that, being an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia is going to have a markedly high number of articles on subjects more intimately tied to the internet.  A r k y a n  &#149; (talk) 17:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The disproportionate number of Furry, Otherkin, Therian and other like types editing on wikipedia would blow your mind. I think alot of it has to do with the percieved need to "defend" their subculture from the bashing that follows them around the internet. In the end it's just a huge mess but what are you going to do? NeoFreak 17:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.