Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circling the drain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was transwiki. Its now on Wiktionary. Wickethewok 15:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Circling the drain
Does not establish notability, comes close to being just a dicdef, and is based on Original Research assumptions in an apparent attempt to coin yet another bogus TV-syndrome neologism. wikipediatrix 18:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO, WP:OR, and WP:V. No verifiable sources are cited to establish notability and back up claims. Scorpiondollprincess 18:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki. Basically a dictionary entry. GregorB 18:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki. Useful and well-written, but referring to a term, rather than an entity, specific activity, or event, and therefore wikitionariable. --Pagana 21:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki. This particular nominator has to learn there are solutions to problem articles other than delete (and since when does it say anything about TV?) Daniel Case 03:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki. I agree with moving it. This is a definition for a phrase. --Balok 20:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Term may have historical significance, not yet edited. Its a pop-culture phrase that may have history on it beginnings, not nessesarly just etymology backing, as would a word from the dictionary. Somerset219 02:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.