Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circum fetishism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to circumcision.  MBisanz  talk 01:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Circum fetishism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreffed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note:. I found one reference fairly quickly, it definitely seems to be a thing. (no judgement from me yet on whether there's going to be enough significant coverage for it to warrant an standalone article though). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep A couple of sources — Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements (book), US National Library of Medicine, Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (book). I've added them in to the article; there's probably a bit more information that can be sussed out of them and added though. There's probably not enough out there for much more than a stub, but it does seem to be enough of a thing to be included here. &#160; Discant  X  09:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep .... Well hey whatever floats your boat!, I found a few booksunder "Circum fetish" and "circumcision fetish" (Unfortunately my laptop being a dick (no pun intended)). – Davey 2010 Talk 23:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DICKDEF. Carrite (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Psst. I think you meant WP:DICDEF. &#160; Discant  X  23:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. There are not enough in-depth sources for an article, hence fails WP:GNG. Possibly the psych crews will produce articles in the future, in which case it could be considered WP:TOOSOON. --Bejnar (talk) 08:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to circumcision, or failing that delete. The article is basically one sentence, stating that circumcision is the object of a fetish (what isn't?). That's just not enough substance for an article.  Sandstein   12:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as not dictionary. Not to mention it's a 1-sentence sub-stub.  If you think there's an article that can be written here, write it in draft space and see if it flies.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, S warm   ♠  23:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable fetish —Мандичка YO 😜 08:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge into Circumcision article and Delete. And by merge I mean add one sentence on it since that's basically what this article is :P --Quadraxis (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. It has 3,650 search returns on google books and way more on google news which is more than some other fetishes on wikipedia. Furthermore, the large number of times such a term or related concepts come up on blogs, forums and other mediums of online discussion makes it notable for me. Who here can honestly say they never heard of for instance the phrase "uncut guys" or "unsnipped guys" used in an objectified manner? Contrib raati (talk) 09:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.