Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cirque Intelligence Service


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 19:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Cirque Intelligence Service
Rumors about a secret service that protects Francophones and plans for a relocation of Israel. Looks like a hoax to me. Delete. Kusma (討論) 03:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Zero Google results. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 03:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Why is it only Google results that indicate the validity of a cause for you? 134.117.181.53 08:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete stupid hoax or too many bong hits.  Ruby 03:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I hardly think the protection of Israel or francophones is supid nor a hoax, please explain your response.134.117.181.53 08:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 03:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - obvious hoax. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 04:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * What are you suggesting is a hoax? What about recent threats to Israel or the ongoing anglophone-francophone debate in Canada are you questioning? 134.117.181.53 08:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - obvious hoax. Doesn't that mean Circus Intelligence Service? Agent Bobo reporting for duty! -Canley 04:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * From Secret Intelligence Service: "Author John le Carré is a former SIS officer, and the agency often features in his novels, where it is colloquially known as "the Circus". Examples include: the George Smiley series and The Tailor of Panama." 134.117.181.53 08:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: This anonymous user (134.117.181.53) vandalised the Cirque du Soleil page to add a reference to this non-existent group, which according to that article is tied to the United States Marine Corps and the World Wrestling Federation! I must say I've never seen such an empassioned defence of such a ludicrous hoax on AfD before. --Canley 22:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, nonsense. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 05:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP Perhaps some of the Wikipedia users here could offer evidence why it is only "Google" search engine results that prove the authenticity of a particular cause. Are any of those here currently arguing for deletion familiar with any of the issues associated with this matter?  On what basis do you feel your desire to delete this page is valid? Are any of you involved with the Cirque Intelligence Service?  This page was created out of a desire to establish information for others about a legitimate organization.   How can those unfamiliar with the security risks of Israel and of the desire to protect and encourage the rights of Quebec offer any sort of opinion on the matter.  How in fact do any of the users contributing to this discussion feel empowered enough to make decision regarding this matter?  Are you in fact francophones?  Those of you that indicate that any desire to protect Israel or the rights of francophones as a 'hoax' is disturbing. 134.117.181.53 08:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I am happy to be convinced that this is not a hoax. Please show that the article is verifiable by citing reliable sources. Thank you. Kusma (討論) 13:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Must be a wikipedia conspiracy. Better get CIS on it. Atrian 04:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as complete boollocks. Blame Canada did this much better - at least it was funny. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 17:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete a waste of bits. Carlossuarez46 19:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Supprimer (Delete) pourquoi? parce que je ne le crois pas... Marcus22 21:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable, for a start. Stifle 14:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.