Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Global Exploiter (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kali Linux. Content may be merged selectively from history.  Sandstein  09:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Cisco Global Exploiter
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSOFT due to lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.  Dr Strauss   talk   08:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete There's a little bit of content online, but not enough to warrant its own article here. I suggest that it be deleted. DoctorG  (talk)  20:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge selectively to Kali_Linux. Using a simple WP:BEFORE style search, I was able to add 5 sources, 3 of them books, and rewrite a little. Hence there is verifiable information about the topic. There isn't quite enough depth in these sources to satisfy notability, but discussions in three books suggests that a brief entry in Kali_Linux would be of due weight and also preserve verifiable information per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. --Mark viking (talk) 19:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.