Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Unified Communications Manager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 17:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Cisco Unified Communications Manager

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be an occupation of which is not notable outside of Cisco. Most sources are not independent and almost all the content is promotional. Mr. Guye (talk) 04:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment The topic of this article is in fact a software system for processing VoIP phone calls. It has nothing to do with the human occupation of management. --Mark viking (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Seven! interwiki articles! --95.158.58.33 (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment 1) As stated before, nominator has no clue about the topic. It is software and not occupation. 2) Article has many external links unrelated to Cisco. --Ilya (talk) 08:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 11:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 13:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Nom, I believe, is confusing human management with this page about software. Orasis (talk) 22:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Cisco sources make up most of the refs, and are not independent. The rest are blogs and how-to sites which do not meet the standards of significant, independent RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 11:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. As noted above, this is not about a human job, it's about a piece of software.  That being said, I don't think this topic meets WP:GNG.  There's lots of references, but they're all internal cisco pages, or various blogs and tutorial sites that don't meet WP:RS.  This is a well-known enough product that my gut feeling is that there could be reliable sources out there which talk about it in encyclopedic way, but the collection we have here aren't it. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.