Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citation needed (5th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Citation found. (non-admin closure) &#128156; melecie   talk  - 00:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Citation needed

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article doesn't have a single Citation, which is pathetic.[Where's my citation already?] Epicgenius (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep and..? this article is "citation needed", not "citation found". &#128156; melecie   talk  - 04:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Self-reference. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  . -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 19:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.