Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citibank Philippines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. No grounds for deleting this article stated in nomination. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Citibank Philippines

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Hi, I do not know if this is the right forum for this discussion. But we have been asked by our client Citibank Philippines to remove their current page on wikipedia. Can you get the needful done? Is there anything more formalties that need to be completed for the same. Thomas db (talk) 04:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Thomas_Db


 * Speedy keep If Citibank's Filipino division wants their page taken off, they can go through the usual Wikimedia Foundation channels, but I doubt they'll remove it. The article is cited and is neutrally stated, and there is no cause for deletion.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - no legitimate reason given for deletion. CopaceticThought (talk) 06:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I dont see why they object, though it isnt a particularly exciting or spammy article. I did some cleanup. If they'll communicate their concerns, we could consider them, but they'll need to be less cryptic. .DGG (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  10:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  10:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, just not the way encyclopaedias work, inclusion of notable entities isn't voluntary to that entity. Usrnme h8er (talk · contribs) 12:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Wrong venue for such a request. Even in the correct venue, such a request will probably be declined. DarkAudit (talk) 14:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.