Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CitisBest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Kurykh  23:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

CitisBest

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Looks like spam, not doesn't seem to pass notability, but I'm not positive enough for Speedy. super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 08:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with nom. This is a poorly spelt, vanity piece, which advertises some kind of commercial web community with minimal noteability. Possibly written as a form of advertising. I dont think it qualifies for a speedy delete but it certainly seems to qualify for deletion imo. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 10:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per both of the above. Bearian 21:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.