Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cititrust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:33, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Cititrust

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Either this is a very shady company, or it's simply not notable. Searching for "Cititrust" on GBooks turns up lots of mentions of a Cititrust in the Bahamas that helps companies with tax evasion by setting up shell firms, but I'm having a hard time figuring out if that is the same company or not.

Note that the current name of the company, according to its website, is "Cititrust International" (which turns up few unaffiliated web hits), and I only searched English-language sources. Maybe better sources are available in Spanish or other languages. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 17:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belize-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete: Even if you found something, I strongly suspect it would fail WP:CORP anyway. Pax 02:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm simply not finding the reliable sourcing. Nwlaw63 (talk) 04:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above, I'm confused as to which Cititrust. I'm seeing some passing mentions international or either way, at most small pieces in Reuters and Bloomberg. Again, not sure if this is the same company though. Page currently reads like promo and spammy as well. Jppcap (talk) 04:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.