Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citroën India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  08:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Citroën India

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Could have been a redirect to the parent company but non-notable on their own. Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Created by a potential WP:SPA. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment The subject does not become less notable if the concerning article was created by an SPA. If Ford India can have article then why not this? I will be checking for sources soon. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 11:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Apparently notable, having received coverage in multiple reliable sources for several years. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 11:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete References in the article are routine launch/corporate announcements or insubstantial news which do not rise above the WP:NCORP bar. The links dumped above are also similar. Hemantha (talk) 03:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  10:44, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG and WP:NCORP per this recent source, as well as some sources already cited above, also little absurd to delete a page from top 10 car manufacturer activity in India Shrikanthv (talk) 07:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Apart from Citroen is part of the Stellantis Group, I cannot identify any information in that article worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Every single sentence in it is attributed to company insiders and is full of buzzwords that mean nothing. I suggest a re-read of NCORP if you consider that to meet it. Hemantha (talk) 10:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.