Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrus Crossing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Citrus Crossing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Disputer PROD. Reason was "This article, short as it is, meanders. Citrus crossing now appears to be a shopping mall where students live, with a theatre surrounded by other stuff. Non notable, and confused, with no references" Fiddle   Faddle  21:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment It no longer meanders, but it remains non notable and unreferenced.  Fiddle   Faddle  21:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's just a local shopping area with nothing to make it notable. Eeekster (talk) 21:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not appear to meet WP:GNG guidelines. The article is unsourced (in fairness, it was PRODded only 10 minutes after its creation, and AfDed after less than an hour, so the author has hardly had time to find references). In a search of Google News I found trivial references but not enough to sustain an article. --MelanieN (talk) 23:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Both PROD and AfD give a decent time for things to be found and added. That is one of the treasons for having the longer processes than CSD. Fiddle   Faddle  11:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.