Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrus Plaza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 06:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Citrus Plaza

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is severely lacking sufficient content. House1090 (talk) 01:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 04:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 04:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agreed that it lacks sufficient content. Also 2 references are dead links and one is link from the developer of this property. Expertwikiguy (talk) 2:32 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete nominator. House1090 (talk) 06:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I've struck the above !vote as a duplicate from the nominator. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Invalid rationale and failure to attempt to improve prior to nominating. I've added more than enough sources to meet GNG. James (talk/contribs) 20:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment "failure to attempt to improve" is not a rational argument for keeping or deleting an article, but it's very good practice to look for sources before rushing to nominate something for deletion. Mirror check. Jacona (talk) 00:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * My language was not clear and I appreciate you pointing that out. I meant to refer to WP:BEFORE, particularly in that an article which is “severely lacking sufficient content” “can be fixed through normal editing [and] is not a candidate for AfD”. I will endeavor to ensure clarity in my comments in the future. What is a “mirror check”? James (talk/contribs) 05:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 18:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.