Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrus production

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Woohookitty 03:41, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Citrus production
Delete. Too vague and nonencyclopedic Zpb52 July 6, 2005 04:12 (UTC)
 * KEEP!. I change my initial vote. Good stuff now! --Zpb52 July 7, 2005 00:01 (UTC)


 * Keep, worthy topic, with plenty of opportunities for expansion. The current content is bad though, and it needs expansion. --bainer (talk) 6 July 2005 05:05 (UTC)
 * Keep - Important topic that has shaped development patterns across the world - but especially in California. Orange County, anyone? Cleanup and expand per Thebainer. --FCYTravis 6 July 2005 06:32 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as above. But Jesus, the article has been in this state for over a year. --Moritz 6 July 2005 09:59 (UTC)
 * I'm adding an expand template. Is this okay while the article is still in vfd? --Moritz 6 July 2005 10:00 (UTC)
 * I've expanded it. It still needs more work but now I think we should keep it.--Dave63 6 July 2005 11:18 (UTC)
 * Keep, good topic in need of expansion. I will be working on adding additional information. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish July 6, 2005 16:36 (UTC)
 * Keep now a good little article thanks to Dave63 and Jareth. Capitalistroadster 6 July 2005 18:37 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good stuff now. -Splash 6 July 2005 23:48 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks like the originator retracted his VFD.   &#08492; astique &#09660; talk 8 July 2005 03:05 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. Interesting stuff! -Uris 04:13, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.