Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CityFlyer Express Flight 8106


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

CityFlyer Express Flight 8106

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable and not notable attempted hijacking. William 23:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  -William 23:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -William 23:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -William 23:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  -William 23:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Nominator fails to describe how it is a non notable hijacking. Passes WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a not-notable asylum seeker who didnt actually hijack the aircraft rather than just making a fuss so he would get arrested and gain asylum. MilborneOne (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the WP:PERSISTENCE qualifier to the WP:GNG; also WP:AIRCRASH, WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. Not every hijacking is notable. Nothing happened here, no continuing coverage, nothing to make this anything more than a "1E-ish" scenario. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.