Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CityPlace at Buckhead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. accoeding to the consensus & the sourcing  DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

CityPlace at Buckhead

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is an article about a canceled condominium project in Atlanta. The only two three references are to the Atlanta Business Chronicle, a local business journal. The project was never particularly notable and now that is has been canceled it is unlikely that it will become more notable. Canceled building projects may be notable in rare exceptions, but this is not one of them. (Contested PROD.)   Will Beback    talk    09:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep based on the below arguments by DreamFocus and the sources found by Northamerica1000. Delete. Building project coverage is limited to local news only, and a business journal at that.  This is insufficient significant coverage of the topic.  I mean, do we generally keep articles based on building projects that never came to fruition if they don't follow WP:GNG? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 09:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 11:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Week Keep – Meeting WP:GNG per:
 * Ramos, Rachel T. "The city that was never built." The Atlanta Journal Constitution.
 * "CityPlace goes back to lender." Atlanta Business Chronicle
 * "Buckhead's largest undeveloped tract up for sale." Atlanta Business Chronicle.
 * Schoolcraft, Lisa R. (March 10, 2006). "3,800 new condos planned for Buckhead." Atlanta Business Chronicle.
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * FWIW, the Journal Constitution article's only mention of the project is a seven-word caption.   Will Beback    talk    23:44, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Some of the Google news archive search results are hidden behind paywall. But the bizjournal coverage seems to be notable.   D r e a m Focus  12:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, should have been kept already, but here's another vote :) The sources provided above are more than adequate. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 07:43, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.