Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City 7 TV (Ireland)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

City 7 TV (Ireland)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable TV channel, Finding everything for the Dubai TV channel of the same name however can't find anything for this, Fails GNG – Davey 2010 Talk 19:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Any updated relevant information about this channel should be moved into City Channel. Since neither the channel nor the parent company articles seem to be up to date, I can't really find any information about it other than it was planned for launch around 2009, not sure if it ever launched based on information in City Channel article. WikiVirusC (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Amazingly the little paragraph at City_Channel seems to be more up to date than the entire article!, Anyway there's not really anything to be merged, Suppose it could be redirected if really desired, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, WP:GNG, WP:CORPDEPTH, and related guidelines. I had considered suggesting merge/redirect, for WP:PRODUCT reasons, and as there is no content here that can't be dealt with in the article on the parent entity marketing this product/channel. However, after looking around to see if GNG/SIGCOV/CORPDEPTH could be established, I can find no indication that the subject entity/product/channel ever actually existed. If anything it seems to stand as an example of why we have WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:TOOSOON guidelines (in that we created an article about something that was proposed to happen in the future, didn't then happen, and now we've got a less-then-useless article cum press release about a project that was never realised.) Best to just delete. Creating a redirect is just kicking-the-can to a later WP:RFD. Guliolopez (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree as per nom WP:GNG Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.