Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Centre Hyderabad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

City Centre Hyderabad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In this state advertising. The Banner talk 18:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone can make it better, because it is not NPOV, is full of opinions, unsourced, and the few sources I found were from primary sources or strongly opinionated pieces Sheepythemouse (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As Sheepy says, not for NPOV, but the writing that makes it seem like only someone in the mall industry could ever decode this industryspeak mess of an article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting; there appears to be consensus to restore the original version of the article, but further discussion is needed to determine the title - and hopefully somebody volunteers to do the restoration? MelanieN (talk) 03:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The article and was about a different subject in a different city and a different state, having been  then renamed.  No-one in this discussion so far has addressed this. Uncle G (talk) 19:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. As Uncle G notes, the article was hijacked with a promotional brochure about a different mall in March 2016. The previous article about the mall in Kolkata didn't cite sources either. An initial search for sources didn't yield much, but my inclination is to revert and move back. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I would have never checked the history. In that case, return the pre-March version to City Centre (Kolkata) and this version and title for Hyderabad should still be deleted.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I had seen the hijacking but in my opinion that meant reverting an advertisement back to a very bad article. The Banner talk 17:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing at all for any applicable notability, nothing to suggest an outstandingly better article. SwisterTwister   talk  00:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:BROCHURE. Hyderabad is a booming city, with shopping malls but also with major daily newspapers. In English.  And I'm not dinging stories about this shopping centre.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Restore and Keep, kudos to User:Uncle G The original article topic, before it was hijacked, is about the City Centre Salt Lake, an apparently notable shopping centre in Kolkata.   Here:  is a news google search on that mall.  Several pages of hits, an article on this Kolkata mall can be sourced. E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)  Suggest that we restore the original article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 03:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete complete history. Both articles about Hydrabad mall and Kolkata mall did not show any notability or any hint of passing WP:GNG. The 26 Jan 2016 version of Kolkatta mall was equally bad. Hence delete both. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - both this promotional guff and the barely-readable unsourced article it replaced fail the GNG quite impressively. ✤ Fosse   8 ✤  15:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.