Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City First


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

City First

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local ticket with no notability, but actively campaigning in local body election. the previous article name "City First (Political Party)" gave the false impression that this is a party. Was previously prodded, but got deprodded with the following edit summary: "rmv prod; by definition deleting a political article is not "non controvertial", & should be discussed. also, they do have at least some nz coverage. If thats not enough,then merge into something suitable?" There is nothing else that is suitable, though. The ticket is headed by two sitting councillors (no WP articles for them) and it got mention in the media with regards to what these two councillors are up to during the election period (i.e. the article was more about the people rather than the ticket that they had formed); no further coverage. This organisation is a very long way off achieving notability.  Schwede 66  01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * what about municipal politics and/or municipal elections in nz? what about "politics in/of christchurch"? Lx 121 (talk) 18:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * New Zealand local elections, 2013 is the only existing article that I can think of that may be suitable.  Schwede 66  18:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete A nascent party of two local candidates does not come close to meeting WP:GNG or any other guidelines for that matter. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 01:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficient coverage in media to be notable. Adabow (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.