Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City In the Sea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

City In the Sea

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BAND particularly item #5 (2nd phrase). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This doesn't look like a clear cut WP:GARAGE case, and I found some sources : Phoneix New Times, (2), Sumerian Records (a primary source but contributes partway to #5 of WP:BAND), Metro Pulse, Peoria Journal Star. However, only the first really is what I'd call significant coverage and that's about all I can muster. While there's a chance the band might be notable later, they just aren't at present. In particular, the claim to have released an album on Mediaskare Records seems to have passed reliable sources by, which kind of suggests no-one really cares. Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   16:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete—Good source sleuthing by Ritchie333. I'd agree that both of the Phoenix New Times articles are significant, but that's only a single source.  Since the article is totally unsourced at the moment, deletion makes sense now.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 19:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ritchie333 and WP:TOOSOON --It's Atreem (From the planet Venus) 21:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Ritchie333 brings up some great points. The band just doesn't have enough out there to be considered notable at the moment . T  C  N7 JM  12:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete utterly lacking notability. Fails WP:GNG time for {{WP:SNOW]] to fall. Fiddle   Faddle  22:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.