Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Link Ltd.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nicely cleaned up.-- Kubigula (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

City Link Ltd.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Just an advert, tells you nothing of note about the company, not neutral, attracts vandals, company isn't all that notable. Mnd999 (talk) 23:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Cursory Google and Google News search shows that the company appears to fail WP:CORP. Will change !vote if notability is shown. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 23:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Changed to Keep per clean-up mentioned below. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 17:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Company and its "parents" have coverage in reliable 3rd party sources | here. I agree the article needs some rewriting and more references (and that it seems the target of vandalism) but, none of these are valid reasons for deletion. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Removed non-neutral text and added a few references (of which two or three give significant coverage), so should satisfy both WP:N and WP:SPAM now. "Attracts vandals" not a reason to delete in itself. Gr1st (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.