Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City at sea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Floating city. The history is still there if there's anything worth merging. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

City at sea

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mostly a WP:DICDEF combined with WP:SYNTH. The saying "city at sea" can't be applied to any single concept, as shown with the disambiguation at Floating city. No need for two disambiguations referring to the same thing. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Ocean colonization. Although different terms on the Floating city disambiguation page could cover the concept, this appears to be the best fit, as it proposes a specific instance of ocean colonization, and does not require a particular political association with that effort. BD2412  T 22:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose deletion This topic is notable and is separate from the previously Floating City. But, I would be supportive of a merge with Ocean Colonization as previously suggested. ~ HAL  333  01:44, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Floating city. Aside from a vague allusion to a "Glassco", which I have been unable to find due to the lack of details, the information in the article is completely unsourced.  And, unsourced information should not be merged into other articles.  I am fine with the term being used as a redirect, though, and the overall Floating city disambiguation seems to be the best place for people to get to what they are looking for.  Rorshacma (talk) 17:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.