Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City municipality of Užice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Užice. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

City municipality of Užice

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is no such thing as "city municipality of Užice". There is the City of Užice, which is covered in article Užice and redirects there, and city municipality of Sevojno, part of the City of Užice. This article purports to describe the remaining part (i.e. City of Užice minus Sevojno), but its only source is a map from the statistical office. The official website https://uzice.rs/ does not mention such municipality, it has no president nor any organs separate from the City's. This entity does not verifiably exist, except perhaps as a statistical unit, and the article is pure OR, providing virtually no conent. None of the linked interwikis describe the same purported thing; most importantly, Serbian interwiki is sr:Град Ужице, describing the whole City of Užice. No such user (talk) 08:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. 08:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC) No such user (talk) 08:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. 08:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC) No such user (talk) 08:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep: This seems to read a lot like a foreign equivalent to a CDP - other CDPs have been kept, as the census is deeming them notable by and through their population. ~RAM (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've already attempted a merge into Užice, since all verifiable info boils down to a single sentence about statistically assigned territory and population. It was reverted by the author, so here we are. I think it's notable the even the "home" Serbian Wikipedia does not have an article about this non-entity so I don't see why we should. It only misleads the readers that it's a real thing. No such user (talk) 08:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge/delete Even if this is a real statistical subdivision, there's no reason it can't be covered in the main article. Reywas92Talk 06:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge: Completely unnecesssary SUBSTUB CFORK. There is no indication that this is anything other than a statistical area and census tracts are usually not considered notable per WP:GEOLAND #1 if there are not sources demonstrating notability.  // Timothy :: t | c | a  14:48, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Užice, subdivisions solely used as census tracts do not pass GEOLAND. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested and is reasonable. Bearian (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.