Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of Bath Technical School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure.— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  11:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

City of Bath Technical School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No claims of notability. Full of spam, OR, no RS's. Mince basically Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 15:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep--I don't see how a school like this, that's been around for quite a while, would not be notable. Having said that, the article is a total mess, of course. Drmies (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- Jmundo (talk) 16:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's a rough consensus that high schools are inherently notable for AfD purposes.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  17:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - it is not correct to say that there are no RSs. The article makes clear that the page is mostly based on documents held at the Somerset Records Office. Such documents are publicly available to allow verification. Sure the page needs some cleaning but that is an editorial matter. I would not be particularly adverse against a merge into Culverhay School. In many ways it is quite convenient to put the information together on predecessor schools in the present school page. However, that would be a matter for a subsequent merge proposal. Meanwhile we have a high school with the thick end of 200 years history and several quite distinguished alumni, for example here. TerriersFan (talk) 20:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - i think, after taking a look through it, that all the relevant information for an article is in there. Just probably not in the most coherent way. The article contains references (albeit agf) with the article itself written in good faith also. A decent Copy-edit as opposed to full on deletion is probably in order. --SteelersFanUK06  ReplyOnMine!   21:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Since the article has been reasonable changed since I submitted it to AfD, as the nominator I would like to Withdraw nomination -- Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 22:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.